Home About Books Recipes Clothing Contact

Monday, February 28, 2011

What I'm Going to Read: Round 18

Ah, it's good to be back. Have I ever told you how much I love seeing all your suggestions? Thank you, thank you for participating. Big squishy hugs for everyone.

The winner this month was Maisie Dobbs by Jacqueline Winspear, suggested by Alison K, a friend of mine who has moved away from Austin but continues to rank high among my reading friends for being the person who read and returned Catching Fire in a single day. Also, she makes killer lemon squares.

Other suggestions:
Of these, I've read 
  • Nurtureshock (review here)
  • Peace Love and Baby Ducks by Lauren Myracle
  • Jessica's Guide to Dating on the Dark Side by Beth Fantaskey
  • The Glass Castle by Jeanette Walls (review here)

    Friday, February 25, 2011

    Deadly by Julie Chibbaro

    Deadly won't be the most exciting book you ever read, but I found it plenty engaging. This story of trying to track down typhoid fever is part historical fiction, part detective novel.

    Books like this make me think of the best teachers and professors I had, that used real books (both fiction and non-fiction), rather than textbooks. And a book that deals with both history and science? Sign me up.

    The story takes place in 1906 in New York City. Prudence lives with her mother in a crumbling old tenement building. Her brother died years earlier and her father went away to fight in the Spanish-American war and has never returned. They quietly suspect he might be dead, but still hold on to hope that he may someday come home.

    Somehow, Prudence's mother has managed to get her into a girl's school as a scholarship student, which, her mother hopes, will launch her into a better life. Students in their last year can get a job on the side, and Prudence intends to do just that.

    But when the job she finds, as an assistant to a city employee for the Department of Health and Sanitation who is trying to track down carriers of typhus , conflicts with the school day, she has to decide if she cares more about graduating as a "lady" or taking a job where she can exercise her interest in disease and science.

    She takes the job, of course, and they begin their hunt for Typhoid Mary, who has never been sick, but might be a carrier, passing the disease from house to house where she works as cook. But it's hard to convince someone that's never been ill that they're making other people sick. Especially someone who is as clean and conscientious as Typhoid Mary is.

    The story is written in diary form and although that is often not my favorite style, it worked well for this story, as it gives Prudence space to reflect on the moral implications of the work they do. How do you force someone who is innocently harming others not to continue working? How do you prove, in these early days of science, that someone is a carrier?

    This is a quick read - I finished it a day while we were home for Christmas (ah vacation, how I love you). But I've thought about it many times since then; the questions it raises are fascinating and have implications far beyond the scope of 1906.

    This is the kind of book I'll be seeking out if I end up homeschooling my children.

    Advance copy sent from publisher

    Thursday, February 24, 2011

    Tell Me What to Read: Round 18

    I am finally finally put together enough to return to Tell Me What to Read. I am certain you have all felt its absence acutely. I even have finally finished and have reviews of the last two books pending. Hallelujah.

    So, on to the main event:

    1. Comment with the title of one book you think I should read (any book you want). One title only, please, lest my brain explode.
    2. I'll select one comment at random and announce it on the blog by the end of the week.
    3. On the off-chance that I've already read the book you select, I'll contact you and ask for a follow-up suggestion (make sure there is a way to contact you either by blog or email).
    4. I'll get a copy of the book and read it by the end of March.
    5. I'll write a review of it here. Even if I hate the book, I will not hate you.

    I'm all excited to see what you lovely readers suggest! It's been too long.

    Wednesday, February 23, 2011

    Seven Months

    Ella,

    You got sick for the first time this month (happily it only lasted about a day and a half). In the middle of the night, I woke up and heard you making a few little noises. Normally, I don't go in to your room during the night, but I thought I'd better check on you, since you were sick and all. When you saw me, you started beaming, waving your arms and legs frantically, all excited that I was there. Too bad it was around midnight, and there was not a chance I was getting you out of bed to play. It was darling, though.

    We have a swing someone lent us that looks directly at the front door. We rarely use it, but on Monday I stuck you in there while I was making lunch, and when your dad walked in the door, I thought you were going to launch yourself right out of the chair, you were going so nuts, waving your arms around and making that screeching eel sound you do whenever you're really excited about something.

    You are just so in love with your dad these days. This morning, while he was ironing his shirt for work, you were sitting up on the bed with me and you rotated your head around as far as you could to watch him. He was facing the other way but every minute or two he would turn around and smile at you. Your face lit up every single time and then you'd just stare at the back of his head until he turned around again. Even when I tried talking to you, you wouldn't look away from him. You're more than welcome, little one, for giving you such a great dad.

    Generally, you are really easy going but, whoa boy, are you afraid of the vacuum. Last week, you were sitting in the living room with your back to me and I turned on the vacuum. I couldn't hear you crying over the roar, but when I looked back at you, I could see your teeny shoulders shaking with sobs. Pretty much broke my heart in half, right there.

    Those shoulders aren't QUITE so teeny anymore, though, since you managed to pack on eleven ounces in the last month. That still lands you in the lowest percentile categories, but it's nice to know you're growing. You didn't even cry when they stuck your toe for a hemoglobin check. And for the first time you wore a dress to the doctor's office and for the first time, no one called you a boy. Statistics would say that is correlation, but not necessarily causation without further testing. I beg to differ.

    Little girl, we love you so much,
    Mama

    Tuesday, February 22, 2011

    Duck! Rabbit! by Amy Krouse Rosenthal and Tom Lichtenheld

    Duck! Rabbit! was one of those books that none of the kids at my schools last year had ever heard of, but once I read it to them, I never saw it checked in again until June.

    This book shows the duck/rabbit on each page, with one off-screen person declaring that it most certainly is a DUCK, while the other insists it is clearly, obviously, definitely a rabbit.

    The book goes through a variety of scenarios where each narrator tries to convince the other that, see, it's certainly the animal they are convinced it is.

    When I would read this book to a class, I would cover the top half of the cover with a piece of paper so the title was hidden and only the image was visible. I'd tell them to not say anything, but to think of what animal this was. Then I'd say, "Raise your hand if you think this animal is a rabbit." Around half the kids would raise their hands and then the other half would look at them incredulously. Then I'd ask the group that thought it was a duck to raise their hands and they'd feel vindicated that they weren't the only ones who didn't see a rabbit.  Ah, the hilarity.

    You can watch part of the book in this cute little video:


    This book is already sitting in Ella's closet, waiting for her first birthday.

    Monday, February 21, 2011

    Before and After

    Long ago, my family lived in Wisconsin. One of my parents' good friends was a professional photographer and in his studio, he had a photograph of a couple and their two young boys in formal attire out in a field with a full dining table. My parents thought this was spectacular and talked for years about recreating it.

    Then, in 1998, my grandparents, who also lived in Wisconsin, announced that they were moving away and my parents decided that if they were going to do this picture, now was the time. And so, on our last visit to my grandparents' Wisconsin home, we took this photograph:


    Because of rain, we ended up taking this picture at around six a.m. The ground was incredibly muddy and it was freezing cold outside. A very large copy of this picture has hung in my parents' dining room for the last twelve years.

    Soon after this picture was taken, my dad mentioned how fun it would be to recreate the picture ten years down the road, with us all grown up. Possibly, there would even be some spouses and grandbabies.

    2008 came and went.

    But then this past fall, everyone was going to be together in Austin for Ella's baby blessing. And it was determined that this would be the moment the photo was recreated.

    The amount of effort that went in to making this happen was insane. Ralphie (who took the new rendition of the photograph) spent tons of time scoping out a spot. My grannie mailed the dishes that we'd used from her house for the 1998 photo to my apartment in Texas. Another friend lent us the chairs, tablecloth and goblets. We rented tuxedos, borrowed the table from the church, and ordered the flowers and the cake.

    Once again, we took the photo early in the morning. We had a procession of two mini-vans and a car. This time it was blazing hot. When we opened the cake box, all the frosting had melted and Merrick had to use baby wipes to get the strawberries looking decent again.

    The husbands kept the wee babies in the air-conditioned car, dashing out every time the cloud cover came over, then racing back to the car.

    All the girls were wearing knee high soccer socks in a (successful) attempt to avoid chiggers and red ants.

    But, in the end, this photograph now hangs in my parents' dining room:

    Friday, February 18, 2011

    Chalk by Bill Thomson

    Chalk was a big favorite to get a Caldecott nod, and now, having read it, I can see why this was such a popular opinion. This book is delightful. If I was doing a mock Caldecott at an elementary school again this spring, this book would absolutely be in my lineup.

    I love a wordless picture book. I remember that my mom didn't ever care for them because then you have to make up the story as you go along, but as a mega-reader, I like wordless books because it makes it easier for me to focus on the illustrations instead of just zipping through the words. 

    The story follows three children walking to the park on a very rainy day. Hanging from the mouth of one of the ride-on dinosaurs is a bag of chalk.

    One of the little girls pulls out a piece of chalk and draws a sun on the rainy ground. And then the real sun comes out and in an instant the rain is gone.

    Of course, now they all have to draw something and see if it comes to life. Which is all well and good, until you draw something scary. . .

    I love how realistic these images are; they make the magic even more striking. The colors are so rich, and this image, where the chalk butterflies turn into real butterflies is breathtaking.


    I think this book, with a box of sidewalk chalk, would be the perfect birthday present for a child. Or for me.

    Thursday, February 17, 2011

    A Little Valentine's Project

    Bart and I thought it would be fun for our children to send their cousins and grandparents Valentines each year. Of course, right now "children" is more like "child" and that child doesn't really have the fine motor skills to make anything resembling a Valentine.

    So we took matters in to our own hands.


    We had a good time putting them together and the mailing worked out that at least some family members got them ON Valentine's Day. Win!

    Tuesday, February 15, 2011

    Moon Over Manifest by Clare Vanderpool

    9 of 10: Moon over Manifest is sparkling historical fiction, set in a little town during the Great Depression and full of flashbacks to WWI. A great pick for the Newbery Gold.

    This one was a big surprise as the winner for the 2011 Newbery medal - most of the major predictors didn't even have it on the short list (although as a few people have pointed out, it did get three starred reviews from the major professional review sources, so it wasn't as if it just came out of absolutely nowhere).

    I requested this book from the library the day the awards were announced and it wasn't even out of processing yet (for some reason, it gives me great joy to be the first person to read a library book).

     Abeline, twelve years old, has spent her life with her father, Gideon, traveling the country as he works on railroads and other nomadic projects. And then, after a brief incident where she gets hurt and takes a bit to recover, he ships her off to spend the summer with an old friend of his, Shady, in the tiny town of Manifest, Kansas where he grew up.

    The whole thing has left Abeline a little blindsided. She has no idea why her father suddenly doesn't want her with him and she's not even certain he's coming back at the end of the summer to retrieve her (although she will hardly let herself entertain such a notion).

    Shady is the interim pastor (when she asks him how long the previous pastor has been gone, he replies "fourteen years"), but he also runs a little speakeasy, since Kansas went dry in 1881, long before national Prohibition. In the room Abeline is staying in, she finds a little box of treasures, the kind of thing a child collects

    One of the items is a letter between two boys, Ned (who is in France fighting in World War I) and Jinx, who apparently was still back in Manifest. There is mention of "the Rattler," who is apparently a spy. Abeline burns with curiosity, but she's not quite brave enough to ask Shady about the contents of a letter she knows she probably shouldn't have been reading in the first place.

    Then, while working off the debt she owes from the town's "diviner," Miss Sadie, after breaking something, she begins hearing stories about the town back during WWI and somehow each of these stories involves one or two of the items in the treasure box. Since she hasn't shown or mentioned the box or its contents to Miss Sadie, Abeliene is perplexed how Miss Sadie knows these stories.

    Between the letters in the box and the stories told by Miss Sadie, Abeline starts to discover that this dusty, dried-up town has a rich history and a previously strong community. But can Manifest return to those better days? And where does her father fit in with this history?

    The story of Abeline's summer trying to hunt down the Rattler dovetail nicely with Miss Sadie's high-adventure stories of Jinx and Ned. And the two are tied together by newspaper columns written during the war by Hattie Mae Harper, which Abeline has been reading for most of her life (her father kept a large collection of them). 


    This one would make a great read-aloud book - the dialogue is snappy and funny, there are so many great stories within the main story, and the cast of characters is varied and wonderful; I'm definitely putting it on my list of books to read my own children someday. 

    It also is lovely that you have both a female and a male lead, Abeline in the present, and Jinx in the past.

    It reminded me a little of Hattie Big Sky, so if you're a fan of that one (and if you're not, what's wrong with you?), you'll probably enjoy this one. This is what historical fiction should be like.


    Copy checked out from my local library. Before anyone else.

    Monday, February 14, 2011

    Valentine-ing

    Isn't Valentine's Day sometimes a kind of awkward day?

    I mean, if you talk about what your lovely significant other did, it can kind of seem like bragging. And guaranteed there is someone in your personal circle of friends who can top it ("and then I looked out the window and there was a new BMW!" or "and then I realized that the card had plane tickets to PARIS in it." (two million bucks to each reader who can correctly guess if these were my Valentine's Day gifts or just made-up examples (also, tragically the two million bucks is most definitely made-up)).

    But if you write something about what a commercial and pointless holiday it is, it's easy to read that as "my husband actually doesn't love me and I'm just pretending to hate the holiday because otherwise I feel like weeping."

    Or maybe I just really overthink everything. Yes, that is a distinct possibility. It's just hard not to think about when most of the blogs I read and nearly every Facebook update is either a "check out this awesome, show-stopping gift/meal/event" or a "what a ridiculous holiday."

    My favorite story of the year, though, goes to Kayla and her husband:
    On the 12th he said, "Hey, isn't Valentine's day in two days or something?" I replied that it was. He put his hand on my knee and said, "Happy Valentine's day." And that was the extent of it.

    I'll probably be laughing about that all week long. I love those two. 

    We did do a fun little Valentine's Day project with Ella, that I'll share later this week. You know, if I'm done weeping packing for Paris overthinking.

    Friday, February 11, 2011

    Things I'm Good At

    • Getting showered, dressed, and my hair done everyday
    • Pretending I'm going to eat leftovers that I actually have no intentions of ever eating, but feel too guilty about throwing away before they go bad 
    • Swinging so high on the swings at the park that I feel like I'm flying (backyard swingsets are never as excellent)
    • Making the bed
    • Cartwheels
    • Driving the speed limit
    • Making bread
    • Getting Ella to smile
    • Maxing out my library holds
    • Wasting time online
    What are you good at?

    Thursday, February 10, 2011

    Room by Emma Donoghue

    9 of 10: When I wasn't reading this book, I was thinking about it. Room, told from the perspective of a five-year-old boy living in captivity with his mother, blew me away.

    You may have heard about this book - it's been wildly popular with all the big review sources, has been a major bestseller, and was on the New York Times list of the 10 Best Books of 2010.

    I never would have picked it up if Julie hadn't so convincingly sold me on it.

    The premise sounds so awful - it's about a woman who has been kept in a shed-turned-prison for the last seven years after being abducted. She has a five year old son (the child of her abductor, of course) and the whole book is told through the little boy, Jack's, eyes. 

    Jack has never once been outside of Room, the eleven square foot shed he and his mother live in. He doesn't even realize there is a world outside of it - the things he sees on TV, he believes are made up. His mother hasn't directly lied to him, but she also doesn't want him to realize all of the world and life he is missing out on.

    And she's done an amazingly good job of making his life as normal as possible under the circumstances. She reads to him, they play games, they have a routine. And his mother protects him, fiercely, from the realities of their situation.

    Then, about a third of the way through the book, they manage to escape (as I saw this coming, I thought that this would really strain my credibility, but it was actually not too bad) and now the world, which has always been so compact and predictable, stretches out into a huge and unknown space.


    His mom has done her best, of course, but there are things you wouldn't even consider that he doesn't know - how to climb stairs or how to judge new distances (he keeps running into things). He can't comprehend that there are multiple copies of the same book in the world. The loss of the rigid routines frightens Jack and he finds himself missing Room and his small existence with just his mother. Because of his mother's protection, Room was virtually entirely positive for him. He knows none of the horrors his mother has.

    Having it told through Jack's eyes works unbelievably well. As an adult reader you catch things that he notices but doesn't understand. When his mother tells him a little about her life before her abduction, her family, her time as a student, he finds this utterly unbelievable, but as a reader it is heartbreaking to hear her story. After they escape, you catch glimpses of the media storm that erupts, but Jack is mainly just amazed to see himself on the television.

    Despite her amazing efforts, Jack's mother not a perfect parent. She gets angry at Jack, she force. And he's not a perfect boy either. They are, both, such real, vivid characters. Their imperfections make it a little easier to imagine yourself in their place.

    It's not depressing, although there is a lot of sadness. Some parts made me laugh outloud, like when she's being interviewed by some Oprah-like person who says, "Now many viewers have been shocked to hear you are still breastfeeding your son," to which the mother responds, "In this whole situation, that's the shocking part?"

    It's been a few weeks since I finished it and I still find myself thinking about it at the oddest moments, remember little details of it (like when the mother has her first shower in seven years or when she tries to explain to Jack that they don't have to make special requests for SundayTreat now, but can buy whatever things for themselves, when they want to). 

    It's not a book that's easy to explain. It's as experiential a book as I have ever read - it's almost like watching a movie, rather than reading a book.

    In some ways, it's like The Hunger Games. The premise just about makes you ill, but somehow it works in a way that isn't graphic or over-the-top. It's heart-wrenching and yet so life-affirming, I wanted to weep (I may have, just a little). 

    Copy checked out from my local library

    Wednesday, February 09, 2011

    Another Episode . . .

    . . . in the likely never-to-end saga of Janssen says "darling," Bart says, "Muumuu."

     


    Ella says, "Beloved Mother, you had to Google the spelling of 'muumuu,' didn't you?"

    Tuesday, February 08, 2011

    Bink and Gollie by Kate DiCamillo and Alison McGhee, Illustrated by Tony Fucile

    I loved Bink and Gollie. And I mean LOVED it.

    It's an unusual cross between easy reader and picture book (it's gotten some criticism for that, actually, because it doesn't fit nicely into an age slot. I say, bah to those humbugs) because it has chapters, but the pictures and vocabulary fit more into the picture book category where you assume that an adult will be reading it to a child. It also has a lot of graphic novel elements, which delighted me.

    These funny little stories about two friends made me laugh out loud. In one episode, Bink buys new socks, but they are so bright and colorful that they offend Gollie. In another, Gollie goes on adventure, leaving notes behind to tell Bink not to knock on the door. As you can imagine, this does not deter Bink in the slightest (although some of the big words in the notes perplex her, "what does implore mean?" she wonders). 

    Their relationship is full of silly conversations and adventures. Two brief examples of hilarity:
    "Hello, Gollie," said Bink. "Do I smell pancakes?"
    "You do not," said Gollie.
    "Will I smell pancakes?" said Bink.
     or, when Bink gets a goldfish she names Fred:
    "Fred wants to roller-skate," said Bink. "Fred longs for speed."
    "Fish know nothing of longing," said Gollie.
    The illustrations, sometimes in double-page spreads, sometimes in multiple panels on a page, are vibrant and full of energy. They completed the story for me, giving shape and dimension to Bink and Gollie. I particularly loved that the backgrounds were usually in shades of gray with the girls in color.


    This book has garnered comparisons to James Marshall's brilliant George and Martha books and I think the comparison is a fair one. They are both funny in a way that isn't dumb and the humor tickles my funny bone in the best way. Not to mention illustrations that make the humor even more sharp. 

    You likely know by now that I don't buy scads of books because  I would rather use the library, save my money, and keep my already-full bookcases from exploding. So it means something when I say this is a book I want to own.  And I'm desperately hoping for more adventures from Bink and Gollie.

    Copy checked out from my local public library

    Monday, February 07, 2011

    Consulting

    Bart's company has the lactation consultation program where any employees or spouses of employees who have a baby get a pre-birth call about nursing and then periodic phone calls to answer questions, give advice, and offer support. (This is a very lovely program).

    The LC assigned to me is located in Vermont, so I've never met her, although I've talked to her on the phone about a dozen times.

    From what I can tell, the consultant assigned to me, Margaret, has a temperament very similar to mine.

    For instance, when Ella was nearly four months old, Margaret called and asked if I'd taken her to the pediatrician for her four month appointment yet. I said, no, that it was coming up in a few days.

    Margaret said, "The official recommendation by the APA is to not start solids until six months old. So if your pediatrician says you should start her on solids at four months without any specific reason, you can say, 'Why are you telling me this when your own association recommends waiting another two months?' Or you can just smile and then come home and not start her on solids until six months. That's what I would do because I don't like confrontation."

    That? A woman after my own heart. Confrontation makes me want to die.

    Margaret's last official call to me was a week ago just after Ella's six month mark. We talked about how long you ought to nurse a baby and she said, "I'll tell you what APA says, what WHO says, and what I say."

    "APA says a year minimum. WHO says two years minimum. I say until it's not right for you or your baby any more. If that's six months, fine, if that's until your baby is four, that's fine too."

    She went on to mention that the average age of weaning worldwide is four years old because so many other countries nurse their babies so much longer. It's mainly in the US where nursing past a year or so is considered unusual.

    She told me, "If you do choose to continue nursing your child for several years, the good thing is that you can tell a three or four year old, 'We only nurse at home' and thus avoid the wrath of the American Public."

    Oh yes, I am all about avoiding the wrath of anyone. This woman speaks to my soul.

    (Also, for the record, it is highly highly unlikely that I will still be nursing Ella when she's three years old).

    LinkWithin

    Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...